Campbell’s County Sideshow an embarrassment

How did we not see it coming? A former England international centre half, rated by Harry Redknapp as still being in the top 6 players in his position even in the entire Football League, goes to League Two’s Notts County who in the 2008/09 season finished 19^th, a mere ten points above the relegation zone. How exactly did we all think it would end?

 

Well perhaps not quite so soon – after one game and one defeat, at Morecambe’s Christie Park, Sol Campbell it is reported told County bosses that he would never be able to adapt to life in the basement division and despite the 5-year contract he had signed only a few weeks previously, chose to walk out on the club with just the one appearance to his name, at the expense of an estimated £160,000. How such a ridiculous episode should ever have been allowed to occur is anyone’s guess and Campbell now fully deserves the enforced time he will receive out in the cold, prevented as he is by the FA ruling from joining another club until the January transfer window reopens.

 

The Campbell transfer saga perhaps best encapsulates the Magpies’ attempt to spend their way out of League Two and embark on a triumphant march up the league, funded by the recent takeover by the still to some extent unknown quantity of Munto finance and Oadbak Investments Ltd and overseen by the newly appointed Director of Football, Sven-Goran Eriksson. However, as we have seen money does not always automatically bring success and only through sensible management can anything meaningful be achieved. The Campbell transfer was undoubtedly not part of any well thought out strategy, but merely an effort at collecting big names in the way that a child might collect football stickers. When the former Tottenham and Arsenal defender’s signing was announced, County’s season having started in spectacular fashion stuttered somewhat, perhaps unsettled by the unnecessary pressure’s piled on the team by the management’s transfer activities. While other high profile signings such as Kasper Schmiechel and Lee Hughes have fit neatly into the work ethic of MacParland’s side, it was inevitable that Campbell would not.

 

Manchester City take note. It has already observed by many commentators that in last Sunday’s epic Manchester derby, City’s real star was not one of the summer’s multi-million pound superstar signings, but the nomadic enigma that is Craig Bellamy. Whilst the man formerly dubbed “the nutter with the putter” on Merseyside may not have the talents of someone like Robinho, City manager Mark Hughes realises the importance of such including such hard-working players in the team building process, even if this is sometimes at the expense of big names such as the aforementioned Brazilian. This is something County manager MacParland has failed to maintain at County, instead perhaps accepting the degree of control from above that saw Campbell attempt to drop down the divisions in such a bizarre fashion. Indeed, if he fails to follow the example of Hughes, who has to some extent managed to resist any attempt of directorial ‘control-freakery’, it may cost him his job.

Touring Lions begin to roar

After the disappointing start against Royal XV last weekend, what a refreshing sight it was to see the British and Irish Lions hit back at their critics with a comprehensive thrashing of their South African Super 14 namesakes at the future Third Test venue, Ellis Park, last night. The 74 points and ten tries scored by the tourists was the second highest ever managed on their journeys to South Africa and what was perhaps most impressive was not merely the extent of the victory but the manner in which it was achieved. In stark contrast to the disjointed display in the tour opener, Ian McGeechan’s charges showed a cohesiveness that is so desperately sought when the best of the British Isles are brought together into one party, and despite the obvious deficiencies in the quality of the opposition, the side showed remarkable unity in putting them away at such an early stage. Let us not get carried away, given history has taught us that Lions tour are inevitably a marathon and not a sprint, but let us see last night’s romp to victory as a statement of intent that the Lions are in South Africa to do only one thing; to win.

Here is my team for the first test on current form and barring injury (and hopefully my own national bias!):

1. Gethin Jenkins (Wales): Regarded by some to be the in-form loose head of world rugby at the minute and difficult to see past his selection.

2. Lee Mears (England): The combative hooker is strong in the loose and solid at the set piece, seemingly more so than Matthew Rees at the key area of the lineout.

3. Phil Vickery (England): Bags of experience coupled with a physicality that will be much needed on the front line of the Lions battlefront.

4. Paul O’Connell (Ireland, Captain): The Lions natural leader, will be key in the lineout battle with Matfield and Botha.

5. Alun-Wyn Jones (Wales): Growing in stature with every performance. Hits the gain line and works hard all over the field.

6. Tom Croft (England): How was this man was not picked in the original touring party? Adds options to the lineout and dynamism to the back row.

7. David Wallace (Ireland): Has the advantage at the moment, but the challenge of Martyn Williams makes this one simply too close to call – a nice problem for the selectors to have.

8. Jamie Heaslip (Ireland): With Andy Powell having yet to have had a big chance stake a claim, Heaslip’s unflashy approach has stood him in good stead as yet.

9. Mike Phillips (Wales): His sheer size sees him stand out above the other scum half choices – the Welshman will take every thing the South Africans can throw at him and give it back with interest.

10. Stephen Jones (Wales): Another close call for the selectors but Jones more robust nature than the admittedly brittle O’Gara will give the Lions one less thing to worry about come the 1st Test.

11. Shane Williams (Wales): Despite current form not being sparkling, the southern hemisphere conditions suit his expansive game. Too good to leave out and experience should see him picked ahead of the pacey Monye.

12. Jamie Roberts (Wales): Seems to have addressed the problems of the Six Nations and is emerging as more than a battering ram in midfield. The perfect foil for BOD.

13. Brian O’Driscoll (Ireland): Back to his vintage best. Jinking past opponents in attack and smashing them back in defence. Will hope to banish memories of 2005.

14. Tommy Bowe (Ireland): Looks ever increasingly like a big match player. The Ospreys wing could be one of the surprise packages of the summer.

15. Lee Byrne (Wales): Despite full-back being one of the positions the Lions are blessed with quality in, Byrne remains the outstanding candidate for the jersey.

And another thing…

·Time for Fed to complete the set: With Rafael Nadal’s shock defeat in the French Open, Roger Federer will never get a better opportunity to complete his clean sweep of Grand Slams. If he goes on to win at Roland Garros, Wimbledon looks set to become another epic encounter between the rivals – unfortunately for patriotic “Murray” maniacs.

· Kaka’nt believe it: The continuing transfer saga over Brazilian superstar Kaka reveals how ridiculous football’s spending culture has become. If it continues in this vein, football will collapse in the mountains of debt at which Europe’s leading clubs operate.

· Six and out?: Is it just me or is anyone else struggling to get enthusiastic about the upcoming twenty20 world cup – never has a tournament been so specifically tailored to merely cash in on the euphoria surrounding the ridiculously overblown IPL and shortened form of the game. Roll on the Ashes.

Cardiff a nugget away, but Tigers roar on

After a thrilling Heineken Cup Semi-Final this Sunday, the rugby world was left with a bitter taste in its collective mouth as Leicester Tigers became the first beneficiaries of the rugby penalty shoot-out, while Cardiff Blues and Martyn Williams in particular were to prove the unlucky losers. To finish a game, which had unexpectedlty jolted back into life after a spirited late comeback from the Welsh side, with such an unsatisfying “lottery” of kicks as it has been dubbed, ensured it will not be memorable for the right reasons. It matters not that on the balance of play it was certainly the more wily Leicester side that deserved to progress to take on Leinster in Ediburgh later this month. The fact remains that at the end of 80 minutes, and then the 20 additional minutes of extra-time, the two teams remained deadlocked at 26 all, and for the Blues to lose in such a manner left supporters and players of both sides feeling that in truth they had not lost at all. As the excellent Geordan Murphy commented sportingly: “It is a tough way to win a game. Although I felt we were the better side on the day, we would have preferred to win it a nicer way. I feel genuinely sorry for the Cardiff boys as that could have easily been us getting knocked out.” So what alternative could have prevented such an unsatisfying end for all concerned?

Cardiff coach Dai Young proposed that “to have sudden death with both sides playing would seem a fairer way of doing things” and few could argue that this should have been the method in place for solving these kind of tense occasions. The “golden point” system, similar to that used in American football for instance, would not only provide a much fairer way to separate two teams, it would a generally more well rounded conclusion to a fiercely contested game of rugby. One must only cast their minds back to the late drop goal victories of Jeremy Guscott and the Lions in 1997, England and Johnny Wilkinson in 2003 and more recently to Ireland and Ronan O’Gara in 2009 to see how thrilling one strike of the boot can be to win a game and in turn immortalise that figure thereafter. It remains preferable in the sporting narrative to create a hero rather than isolate a villain.

It was perhaps the cruellest of ironies that the villain of the piece last weekend should have been Cardiff’s stalwart and one of Welsh rugby’s most consistent performers in recent times. For someone who has given so much to the region’s cause to effectively end their chances of reaching the Heineken Cup Final for the first time in over ten years was not only a damning indibtement of the shoot-out system, but a heartbreaking blight on the man’s career. Williams of all people does not deserve such an unwanted accolade and yet it should be the case that he remains the only man to miss a sudden death kick under such a system, if justice is done and the it is scrapped. Let us also hope that the nuggety flanker overcomes this ordeal, secures that elusive First Lions Test cap this summer and that the Blues failure will pale into significance next to a victorious tour to South Africa under his belt.

And Another Thing…

• I hate to say I told you so…: Ricky Hatton’s demise at the hands of Manny Pacquiao in Las Vegas in Saturday’s wee hours was predicted by yours truly in this very blog mere months ago. I wish I had been proved wrong after the Pac Man proceeded to tarnish another reputation, this time within two rounds, using his truly awesome speed and power. Next stop: Floyd “the Money” Mayweather.
• Six of the Best: Barcelona’s drubbing of Real Madrid was one of the finest displays of pure attacking football I have witnessed and only the stoniest hearted of patriotic neutrals will hope for anything other than a win for the Catalans in this year’s English dominated tournament.
• Snookered on the Red: Why has so much of this year’s Snooker World Championship been banished to the obscurity of the red button. This year provided a fine tournament, yet the BBC still prioritises it’s endless stream of daytime antiques and property shows, such as bargain hunt, leaving snooker fans hunting around themselves, through a stream  of irritating menu screens.

Lions choose Celtic flavour for “pinnacle of rugby”

So, the impossible selection has been made. Rugby players among all the four nations will wake up for the first time today having learnt whether they will among the 37 hopefuls who will travel to South Africa this summer, all of whom will fiercely contest the test places which commentators have been falling over themselves to describe as being “the pinnacle of the game”. And as expected their will be some left ruing their failure to convince Ian McGeechan and co that their presence was needed, whilst others occupy those few surprise choices which emerge on the selection of any Lions touring party. Ultimately, have they got it right? At this early stage it is difficult to say and without looking to sit on the fence, the proof will be in the pudding. It is no surprise that all but three of Ireland’s Grand Slam clinching side make the cut, nor perhaps that Wales will represent thirteen of the spots on the plane to South Africa. Although many fans and pundits alike may bemoan the failure to include more of the resurgent English side, it is through the virtues displayed throughout the tournament by the Irish and Welsh Celtic cousins that will decide the Lions fate in the southern hemisphere. Where the three tests and warm up games will all be decided will be in matching the physicality and pace that the South Africans display week in week out in the domestic Super 14 competition, and also in keeping discipline in the face of such an onslaught – something which both Declan Kidney and now Lions forwards coach Warren Gatland emphasised in their teams play throughout the tournament and something which as yet Martin Johnson has been yet to ensure amongst his own charges. Scotland too can complain little about their worst showing in a Lions party since 1930, as their wretched Six Nations campaign gave little ammunition for Lions head coach and proud Scotsman McGeechan to push for the case of some of his fellow countrymen.

Nevertheless, although the make up of the squad in nationality was as should be expected in view of the respective International formbook, the announcement did provide us with a few shocks as to who were to be those chosen from each nation. Tom Croft will count himself incredibly unlucky not to be included, transforming as he did the England back row mid-tournament in the Six Nations, and Danny Care will be ruing his indiscipline against Ireland costing himself a place amongst the scrum halfs, especially as he seems more suited to the physical challenge than the preferred Harry Ellis. Equally Mike Blair will be disappointed that playing in such a poor side has counted against him in this case and Dwayne Peel frustrated he has had not more of a chance to stake a claim since his return to the Welsh squad. Places at full back and on the wing seem to have been equally closely contested and Delon Armitage must’ve been close to capturing a place as a utility back. However, the selections of the talented Leigh Halfpenny, Luke Fitzgerald and powerful Ugo Monye, holding off as they did the challenge of names such as Paul Sackey, Mark Cueto, Mark Jones or Simon Danielli, shows a sign of intent from the Lions management to match the pace and talent of their opposite numbers, Bryan Habana and JP Pietersen.

Club form seems to have played heavy on the mind of the selectors, indicative in the triumph of the Cardiff Blues’ Andy Powell over Welsh team-mate and captain Ryan Jones. Ospreys’ poor display in Munster in the Heineken Cup Quarter Final has seemingly cost both he and his club mate James Hook a place on the list, whereas both Cardiff Blues and more noticeably Munster players, after both reaching the semi-finals impressively, form the nucleus of the squad. Both McGeechan and Lions manager Gerald Davies will hope that the “Munster mob” and in-form Blues men who take the trip can transform their impressive displays in European domestic competition to the grandest of stages come June. Such hopes see two players largely unrecognised by Ireland’s selectors take two places which could very well have gone to more established names, and it will be left to the speedy James Earls and renowned hard-man Alan Quinlan to justify this show of faith.

The selection of Paul O’ Connell as skipper further illustrates the extent to which this team has been made around the model of Munster and the Lions will hope they can emulate the Irish side’s ability to front up and bring their own brand of hostility, aggression and resolve as an away team, as well as producing a brand of attacking rugby that can triumph in South Africa. How then will they fare? Many have been offering gloomy predictions in recent months and it certainly does look a formidable task that awaits them. However, we must not forget that the South Africa side should have been beaten by Wales in the last round of Autumn Internationals and did not play Ireland in their tour of the British Isles. Equally, they finished bottom of the last Tri-Nations table and despite their triumph in the 2007 World Cup Final they do not have the same air of invincibility as the opponents of the last Lions tour, the All Blacks. Jeremy Guscott has backed the underdogs to triumph 2-1 as they did in 1997 thanks to his late drop goal and with my heart ruling my head somewhat, I am predicting the same. Let us hope the Lions bite is as strong as their roar.

The Return of the King

 

So Newcastle F.C. has finally relented to the overwhelming pressure of the Toon army. After the continued health problems of Joe “F***ing” Kinnear (get well soon Joe!) and the failure of Chris Hughton to carry the baton as caretaker, controversial chairman Mike Ashleigh (of cockney mafia fame) has bowed down to supporter pressure and opted for the fans favourite choice to steer the club from the relegation mire they are so deeply in. No they haven’t resurrected Kevin Keegan’s managerial career once again, they’ve gone one better. Alan Shearer after constantly reiterating his desire not to go into management at this stage of his life, has emerged on his white (or should that be black and white?) charger in an attempt to rescue the club to whose fans he is regarded as being on a higher plane than many of the other mere mortals who have failed to live up to the ultra-high expectation at the Geordie club. The question on everyone’s lips is, will it work?

 

Well it just may do. Look at Trevor Brookings’s late season impact at West Ham a few years ago. However, Brooking remained a vastly experienced name in the world of football. Shearer at 38, although certainly retaining the right credentials as a player, is an unknown quantity in a managerial capacity. By appointing Shearer, rather than a more experienced candidate such as the mooted prospect of Terry Venables last week, Newcastle have taken a massive gamble on their short term future, by thrusting an untested fans favourite into the grim situation Newcastle find themselves in. It has got Mike Ashleigh into trouble before – his appointment of another “legend” in Kevin Keegan, although ensuring he remained briefly popular with the St. James’s Park faithful, is what started the club’s malaise which has seen them drop into the bottom three, with only 8 games remaining of the Premier League season. Does Shearer’s career as a player and his experience from playing at the top level, give him enough to turn the team’s fortunes around?

 

Only time will tell on this particular situation. The Geordie boys have a tough run in with Chelsea and local rivals Middlesboro still yet to come to St. James’s and with tough trips to Anfield, White Hart Lane, Villa Park and the Britannia Stadium to meet fellow strugglers Stoke, it looks a formidable task that lays ahead for the former England striker and his new charges. Ultimately though, precedent is not with Newcastle’s all-time leading goal-scorer. Other players who have lit up the game on the pitch have struggled to make a sufficient impact as managers or coaches. Glenn Hoddle, Bryan Robson, John Barnes, even Keegan himself, although enjoying some periods of success as managers have never been able to get over the troubling reality that many members of their sides are simply not capable of producing the level of performance they had been able to in their playing days. In contrast, the games best managers by enlarge, have not had outstanding playing careers – for example Wenger, Ferguson and Mourinho, despite enjoying mixed fortunes as players, (the latter indeed never played at a professional level) have gone on to become some of the most outstanding managers of their generation.

 

If Shearer can break out of this cycle then all credit to him. If he succeeds in wrestling United away from the drop zone he will further cement his reputation as the most important and well loved figure in the club’s history. However, by taking on the difficult task that awaits him he has put his reputation on the line. Will Newcastle fans ever be able to think of him in the same reverential light again if it is by his hand they face the drop into the second tier? And more importantly will Mike Ashleigh risk getting “Shearer 9” on the back of his replica shirt?

Emotional day in Cardiff leaves food for thought

 Apologies for taking until Monday to posy my thoughts on the rollercoaster finish to the 2009 Six Nations Championship. But it simply was that kind of game – it’s emotional intensity simply of too great a magnitude to reflect in a brief passage of text such as this. Nevertheless here is my effort to condense the almost literary saga of Saturday’s clash at the Millennium Stadium from the perspective of the defeated Welsh. Firstly let me congratulate Ireland on their performance that was to dramatically seal a first Grand Slam since 1948 and the relief on the faces of the travelling supporters and players alike showed how sweet the long-awaited victory was to prove. Few Welsh supporters would begrudge their fellow Celtic cousins their taste of a Grand slam victory, one which they themselves had enjoyed in 2008. That it came at the expense of yet another spirited defeat from the home side should be the real concern for Warren Gatland and his coaching team.

Welsh legend, and my namesake, Gareth Edwards called for a sense of perspective in the aftermath of this weeks loss and he certainly makes a valid point. In 2007 Gareth Jenkins’ Wales had suffered an ignominious exit from the World Cup at the hands of minnows Fiji and the future looked to be bleak for the nation’s rugby prospects. At the climax of the 2009 Six Nations, Wales came within one fell swoop of the boot from clinching a Triple Crown and could potentially at least have clinched the Championship itself in the final game on points difference. Although they were to eventually finish fourth (as my English supporting friends have been quick to point out) as Stephen Jones last minute penalty fell agonisingly short of the posts, the fact remains that the two best and ultimately most consistently competent teams of the tournament were the two fighting it out in the final contest of this year’s tournament. All of Wales’ opponents had raised their game considerably when facing the previous years Grand Slam champs (a look at the Jekyll and Hyde nature of some of the French and English performances illustrates this) and this is something that Ireland will now have to go onto face when it is their turn to defend the title. The important thing from a Welsh perspective now is how the men in red respond from a campaign whose legacy will be judged on what is to follow it.

The Welsh failure to score a try in Saturday’s encounter adds to growing concerns that although the current strategy is one which ensures Wales will always compete in matches, it remains overly reliant on individual brilliance of figures such as Shane Williams to produce the goods. When such players fail to consistently turn in outstanding performances, or become unavailable through injury as was the case after Lee Byrne’s first half replacement this weekend, the team as a whole does at times not look threatening enough. This is something that the ever outspoken Gavin Henson has been keen to point out, that Wales need to concentrate on their own way of playing before worrying about countering their opposition’s style of play. Such a challenge will represent the first real questioning of Kiwi coach Gatland’s management style and it will be interesting to see how the “Gatfather” of Welsh rugby responds.

Another area of concern that was made painfully clear at the weekend was the malignant deficiency of the Welsh lineout, especially in the face of the pure destructive force of the magnificent Paul O’ Connell, who will surely now stride out this summer as Lions Captain in South Africa. The improvement of the Welsh scrum during the reign of the current coaching team has been refreshing and given the side a more stable platform on which to build, thanks mostly to the sterling work of more potential Lions, Gethin Jenkins and Adam Jones. The lineout must see the same level of development if the long-term goal of consistently competing at the world stage, or even the short term goal of maintaining it’s place amongst merely the Northern hemisphere nations, are to be achieved.

Such problems will be addressed when the Welsh side reassembles during the Autumn Internationals and thoughts start to wander towards the next Six Nations Championship and beyond. Before that however, the four home countries will have to put their differences aside and pull together in order to “front up” to the tremendous physical challenge that no doubt faces the aforementioned British and Irish Lions in deepest South Africa when June rolls round. There is sure to be a conspicuous Welsh presence on that trip and it will the players lucky to make the tour, the opportunity to further themselves and aid their development as truly world-class test players. For this is what they need if the current Welsh team are to move forward from Warren Gatland’s end of term report which will undoubtedly read, “Good but could do better”.

And then there were two…

After another weekend of exciting Six Nations action and after two closely fought games on the Saturday and an unexpected rout on the Sunday, only two teams remain in a straight shoot out for the Six Nations championship. Wales know they must win next weekend in Cardiff by a margin of 13 points if they are to wrestle this year’s title from the Irish grasp and all the impetus is with Declan Kidney’s men, looking to grab the Grand Slam for the first time since 1948. But on this week’s showing can they take the pressure in front of packed house in the Millennium Stadium?

A lot depends on whether Wales can raise their game above the fairly below par level of performance they have turned in the past few weeks. This week’s showing against Italy, with the highly rotated starting line-up showing ten changes from the side that lost in France just over a week previously, did not seemingly force the squad from the state of inertia that has persisted in recent matches. Warren Gatland’s decision to take a gamble by resting his senior players and ensuring the more peripheral figures get game time, looks in hindsight to have been a gross underestimation of the resurgent Italians and ultimately a mistake, given Welsh fans were forced to endure another nervy narrow victory, which has resulted in the difficult points deficit to overturn in the final fixture. But Gatland’s plans are clearly longer term and few can quibble with the need to develop a greater level of strength in depth in Welsh rugby – “the Boss”, as Shaun Edwards referred to him as, clearly works in mysterious ways.

Let us not forget that Wales did in fact win the game and do indeed go into the Ireland clash with a shot left at the Triple Crown and the Trophy. What matters not is the poor level of performance but where the team go from here. Backs coach Rob Howley admitted that “we probably made too many changes,” after the nervy 20-15 win in Rome and admitted “we got away with it, got out of jail”. The controversial Gavin Henson openly vented his frustration after the win and it seems that the camp as a whole is determined to put things right next weekend. Ireland certainly will prove a tough proposition, gunning as they are for a long awaited Grand Slam and the experience of the ‘Munster mob’ will stand them in good stead in such a high stakes encounter. But pressure can do funny things to a side, especially when expectation looms large.

A side who have finally been able to match this weighty level of expectation are England who turned in their best performance of this year by far in their highly impressive 34-10 victory against France this Sunday. The addition of Tom Croft in the back row gave their previously lumbering pack a new found sense of dynamism, allowing exciting backs such as Delon Armitage, Ricky Flutey and Mark Cueto the space in which to express their talents. This win finally gives Martin Johnson something to build on as coach and this must start next week against Scotland for the win over the French to have any relevance other than a timely morale boosting victory. This is something which the French themselves were unable to achieve, reverting as they did this weekend to the old unpredictable enigma, irresistible one week and indefensible the next. It is no coincidence that the sides who have found the highest level of consistency in competing in this year’s Championship matches are the final two remaining who can still lift this year’s trophy. But who it remains, will that be? Next weekend’s “Super Saturday” should give us an entertaining solution to this conundrum.

Where to next for defeated England?

Reflecting back on another agonising finish to the final test between the West Indies and England this past week, one can’t help but once again rue that the tourists got so near but yet so far from victory. England’s falling short once again on the final day meant that the West Indies’ players won their first test series in five long years and first of all credit must go to the players who showed immense character and determination to defeat the under pressure England side, despite being admittedly outplayed in large parts. In some ways it would have been a shame had Chris Gayle’s negative outlook from day one in the Port-of-Spain test ultimately seen them concede the final test and missed out on the long awaited series win for the supporters in the Caribbean. But what are the lessons to be learned for both England and perhaps cricket as a whole, in the wake of a mixed series.

What issues will confront stand in coach and captain combination Andrew Strauss and Andy Flower on their return to blighty? Well their most immediate concern will inevitably be securing their own positions against the other leading contenders pushing to be the new men to take England forward, most importantly towards the looming home Ashes series. Andrew Strauss seems to have secured the captaincy for the near future and emerged as a leader of some stature in the West Indies, through his back to form batting performances above all else. His captaincy at times still retained the tint of negativity that seems to have plagued the lacking in confidence side for a while and if he is to retain the job in the long term, it is breaking out of this mindset that will be the key to securing the much needed first test win under his new regime. However, his long term future could be largely influenced by other decisions that await the ECB over the coming weeks.

Andy Flower’s early forays into the role of England’s coach seemed to have had mixed results – whereas the Zimbabwean has done nothing wrong, his tenure had no discernable difference to that of his predecessor Peter Moores, bar perhaps the left-field selection of Amjad Khan. The upcoming One Day Internationals will give the man with an illustrious record in all forms of cricket, a further opportunity to make his mark and stamp his own identity on an England team that is crying out for a new sense of character. The most interesting adversary to Flower’s position as incumbent seems to be the Kent supremo Graham Ford. Kevin Pietersen’s fellow countrymen seems to have been the former captain’s preferred choice to replace Peter Moores and if he was to pip Flower to the post, it would give a new dimension to the ongoing saga that looks set to persist until the issue is finally resolved.

What does the series mean for Test cricket as a whole? As previously stated in this blog, the standard of test pitches has been called into question after a number of turgid matches and the lessons of this must be learned fast if interest is to be maintained in the bastion of the game. Hopefully, the powers that be will realise that supporters want to watch a thrilling test match, and if this means a three or four day test with plenty of action above a five day non-event then so be it. Think back to the thrilling three day test in 2000 between the same two sides at Lords. If Test cricket is to maintain its prestigious status as the focal point of the game, it quite simply must review its ability to produce excitement for the watching public. Perhaps the most pertinent issue of the many that have arisen after the West Indies’ recapturing of the Wisden trophy is the controversial referrals system and whether the ICC should persist in its implementation. Much has been said on the debate but my personal opinion is that it can still provide a useful tool to ensure the right decisions are to be made, if the inconsistencies of its current form are ironed out. If it is to be established that the third umpire is only able to overturn the on-field decision if there is clear evidence to suggest this should be the case, decisions such as Shivnarine Chanderpaul’s edge behind, for which he was given a reprieve should not occur, despite what ever gut feeling may persist amongst those viewing the video replays. Such a deadlock is inevitably more likely to occur anyway unless the system is not given the full backing of the available technologies, particularly the increasingly useful hotspot camera. If we are to have to put up with the umpiring of figures such as the hapless Daryl Harper and Russell Tiffin, any form of support that can be given to the less than impressive on-field decision making can only be a good thing. Just ask the increasingly animated Bob Willis!

A bridge too far for the Hitman?

When I heard the news that Ricky “the Htiman” Hatton is to once again fight out it out for the tag of “best pound for pound fighter in the world”, this time against the phenomenon from the Philippines, Manny Pacquiao, I have to admit my initial reaction was to worry for the prospects of the intrepid Brit slugger. When reports that the contest was in doubt after the Filipino fighter’s demands rose from a 50/50 split of profits to a 60/40 cut in his favour I even began to feel relieved (and if you don’t believe me – check out his “greatest hits” on youtube at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4a3I_YT9FIs). Having seen the four-weight champion destroy the admittedly weary Oscar De La Hoya I fear for the Hitman’s chances. Despite being a great admirer of the Manchester boxer’s pure guts and determination to fight, and I daresay a “Hatton” fan I am nevertheless reluctant to see him go into the ring once again in America against another superior boxer such as the ‘Pac Man’. Another defeat would massively undermine the Mancunian’s ‘legacy’, a term that must inevitably come into consideration when a fighter’s career begins to enter its final stages. For Hatton, a defeat would reinforce the prevailing image that followed the defeat to Floyd Mayweather – that Hatton remains one of the best British boxers of his generation, but is just not quite of the ilk of the truly great fighters. Perhaps Ricky should have gone the way of Joe Calzaghe, whose recent retirement on top of an unblemished record presents the enduring image of the Welshman’s career, whereas a final defeat would have left a bad taste lingering in the mouth of British boxing. Ultimately, I hope that come May 2^nd in Las Vegas, backed once again by his travelling army of fans, that Ricky proves me wrong and defeats the ever popular southpaw Pacquiao. A loss however would greatly overshadow the glittering career that Hatton has had and that would indeed be a great shame. Is it worth the risk? That we will only know after the 12 rounds.

 

If the match up does stay true to form what are the chances of a potential super fight between ‘the Mexicutioner’ and the former holder of the top rated pound for pound honour, Floyd “Money” Mayweather. As his moniker suggests, in Mayweather’s world it is the size of the purse that talks and a fight between these two multi-weight champions would be guaranteed to be a massive draw worldwide, potentially great enough to lure the American out of his flexible “retirement”. His contest with the WWE superstar the Big Show at last year’s Wrestlemania says everything you need to know about the motives of the man from Michigan. Indeed after Pacquiao’s impressive performance in putting away the off colour De La Hoya in 2008, and being in a position to potentially inflict a first defeat for Hatton in the light-welterweight class, he seems to hold the best hope of any fighter in recent times of upsetting the “Pretty Boy”. And as I’m sure you’ll agree that is something everyone would like to see in 2009.

Snore draw has dour implications for Test cricket

It may be over a week since the nation celebrated Shrove Tuesday by making pancakes, but in looking at the soporific test match between the West Indies and England this week, one suspects that the Barbadian groundsman had been a week late in producing a pancake of his own. The pitch yielded a massive 1,628 runs over the five days whilst both sides only managing to muster 15 wickets between them, neither being able to bowl the other out. On the subcontinent the contest between Pakistan and Sri Lanka proved to be affected by an equally pitch-induced stalemate with 1,553 runs being scored in this case with once again only 18 wickets being taken. Such test match play, in which the bat dominates on docile surfaces is perhaps what led the outsider Allen Stanford to label it “boring”. Even the most hardened cricket supporters were struggling to disagree this week.

 

As a result of the recent test run-fest, former England Captain and one of the key players from the days in which England tours to the West Indies were synonymous with fiery spells of fast pace bowling, Graham Gooch, expressed his concerns for the future of test cricket in view of the ever growing number of “lifeless” test pitches. He told BBC Radio 5live, “Pitches are quite benign, very flat and lifeless…what you see now is pitches becoming flatter, truer and deader as the match goes on,” whereas “You want it to spin quite a bit or go uneven in bounce – become a bit untrustworthy. That creates a chance of a result”. Indeed, what has made classic series’ such as the 2005 Ashes so enthralling was the fact that the surfaces on which they have been played offered something to both bowlers and batsman alike. A batsman who knuckles down can build a score whilst bowlers who put it into good areas are likely to be rewarded with wickets. In the current test climate this simply isn’t the case, and both the M.C.C and I.C.C who’s remit is to preserve a balance between bat and ball in world cricket, should step in to take measures to redress this balance.

 

Indeed, it is not all doom and gloom in the world of test cricket. Australia and South Africa, two very closely matched sides, once again produced an enthralling match in which upon entering the final day all three results were seemingly possible. The previous test in the Caribbean, on the hastily arranged A.R.C also illustrated the joys of hard-fought, closely matched test play. This is how it should be and no doubt groundsmen the world over should follow this example if interest is to be maintained in the five-day format, a set up which is becoming increasingly threatened by the glitz and glamour of Twenty20 and the I.P.L. Moreover, with the saddening events that are unfolding in Pakistan as I write, it seems that the future of test match cricket, particularly amongst the Asian nations where the one-day game proves more popular anyway, is being plunged into uncertainty. This can only be a bad thing for the game as a whole and a call to arms of all cricketing traditionalists must be made to secure it’s future.